When I was a young programmer, the key punch ladies used
to make cup cakes for the rest of the IT department. All of us enjoyed
them at morning tea time, as well as the corresponding witty and fun
conversation that was part of that daily ritual.
What happened of
course is that we, being IT, were slowly automating the data entry
processes and no new key punch ladies were being employed, at least
during the years that I worked at the organisation. The ladies used to
remind us, every now and then, that if we worked too hard, there might
not be anything left for them to do. I moved on, into different pastures
and always just assumed that those lovely ladies retired, still happy
(I never did find out, something I must do one day).
always stuck in my mind, that as the technology progresses, the social
and composite nature of teams change, to match the new potential that
has been enabled. As they do evolve, you need to be mindful of people
but you also can’t keep delaying change. I don’t hear of organisations
now, that still have a separate key punch group, in their IT department.
What about you?
Why don’t we have them now? We’ll communication
technology has improved and now IT departments are invariably known as
ICT (Information and Communication Technology) departments. The
communication allows once manual processes to be automated. The
internet, allows exchange of information between organisations, so
reports aren’t printed in one organisation (or department) that needs to
be re-keyed into a computer in another organisation.
internet is now becoming mainstream and increasingly being used to
communicate, all sorts of useful knowledge and information, it has
encroached on more traditional means of communication. A companies’ web
presence is in many circumstances the first point of call for new or
existing customers. It may no longer be a brochure or some form of
advertising. This has meant that the marketing and public relations
persons, want to ensure that these internet based presences are executed
properly; that is they portray the correct corporate image and
messaging. This isn’t an easy task to achieve and if you think about it,
there is potential for tension between the different disciplines.
the last while, social media has come to the forefront. Who should
drive the strategy? Who owns it? What is the nature of the skill sets
required to successfully deliver it? What do you do if someone in your
organisation says something they shouldn’t have? (yes, a lot more people
are writing things about or for your organisation)
recognised for a while, that you need a composite set of skills spanning
multiple disciplines including marketing to address the aforementioned
questions. Yes, us IT guys now need to work with the marketing bunnies (
a term I use with endearment), copy, usability, graphic designers etc.
All those people that help make the experience better for the consumer
of the medium being used.
Social media is moving rather quickly
now, and I was reminded of some of this potential for tension that has
been rising between the different disciplines as they seek to take
ownership last weekend. I found this blog post "Why
your IT person shouldn’t manage your social media!" written by
Diane Lee and as you can see it wasn’t IT getting upset at Marketing but
the other way round. It hit a note with me, and I tweeted about what a
Marketing Bunny was saying about the social capabilities of IT persons.
We’ll you can tell by the comments on that post, that it hit the same
note with a number of others. However, we were willing to help bridge
these gaps if we saw a sincere apology (the apology happened, can read
Taryn Hicks was concerned about the implications of
the original entry written by Diane and wrote "Why
Marketing and ICT should work together on social media: a response to
mosaic communications". It is well worth reading, as well as the
New composite teams are required, to master not
only implementing social media, but also with responding to the
implications. There are no text books for where we are going, just
etiquette, common sense and trust through sharing our knowledge openly.
Those that share, are those that are respected by the communities they
are involved in. Those that break the unwritten rules, are given another
chance, as long as things aren’t swept away under the carpet. Mistakes
are shown, so that others may learn. Maybe that’s where our text books
are now, on the internet, held in conversations on twitter, in online
forums and on blog entries? Continuously being appended to as we learn